Subscribe to stay informed about our latest updates and industry news!
Learn how EURK plans to revolutionize the stablecoin market and provide a reliable digital currency solution.
Follow us:
© 2024 Eurk
Digital assets are subject to a number of risks, including price volatility. Transacting in digital assets could result in significant losses and may not be suitable for some consumers. Digital asset markets and exchanges are not regulated with the same controls or customer protections available with other forms of financial products and are subject to an evolving regulatory environment.
Disclaimer: The information contained in or provided from or through this website is not intended to be and does not constitute investment, financial advice, trading advice, or any other type of advice.In no event will EURK or its affiliates, or any of its or their respective service providers, be liable to you or any third party for any use, interruption, delay or inability to use the software, lost revenues or profits, delays, interruption or loss of services, business or goodwill, loss or corruption of data, loss resulting from system or system service failure, malfunction or shutdown, failure to accurately transfer, read or transmit information, failure to update or provide correct information, system incompatibility or provision of incorrect compatibility information or breaches in system security, or for any consequential, incidental, indirect, exemplary, special or punitive damages, whether arising out of or in connection with this text, breach of contract, tort (including negligence) or otherwise, regardless of whether such damages were foreseeable and whether or not we were advised of the possibility of such damages.
We use cookies to improve your experience. To find out more, please read our Cookies Policy. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to our Cookie and Privacy Policy. Or you may click “Decline”to refuse to consent.
EURK Pilot Test Smart Contract is unavailable for security reasons as of 2nd of April. Therefore, EURK will not be available for buying, selling, and exchanging until further notice.
The problem is being resolved by our team of technicians.
We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience caused.
For assistance and/or to report any incident, please contact our dedicated support team at [email protected]
Please stay tuned and await further updates.
EURK Team
Blockchain technology has revolutionized how we securely store and transfer assets through the introduction of cryptocurrencies with consensus mechanisms like proof of authority (PoA).
While consensus mechanisms like Proof of Work (PoW) have proven secure, their energy demands have also drawn criticism. As the blockchain industry evolves, newer consensus algorithms are emerging that aim to address these issues. One such algorithm gaining recognition is proof of authority.
In order to verify transactions and maintain the distributed registry, a private blockchain can use a consensus mechanism called PoA. Since less energy and computer time are needed, the network can be updated more often and greater transactions can be processed for a lower transaction fee.
In order to improve scalability with a small number of block validators, the system relies on moderators, who are pre-approved individuals who verify blocks and transactions.
In this article, we'll take a deeper look at PoA, how it works, and compare it to other consensus mechanisms. By the end, you'll have a better understanding of this efficient alternative and its potential role in the future of blockchain.
PoA relies on "authority nodes," or validators, who are trusted entities pre-selected to validate blocks and transactions on the blockchain network.
The main distinction between PoW and Proof of Stake (PoS) is that identity rather than wealth or computational power determines authority. Around 6–15 different types of nodes are typically involved in PoA networks.
The process begins when a validator receives a new transaction. They independently validate it according to the network's rules before signing off.
Once a majority of validators have signed, the transaction is packaged into a new block that gets added to the growing blockchain in quick succession. Few consensus rounds are required due to the limited number of trusted validators.
There are three criteria that users must achieve in order to become validators: reliability, morality with a clean record, and identification.
Their reputation is dependent on their spending time and investing money validating their identification on the network and conducting cross-reference research in the public sphere.
System reliability is ensured by this comprehensive strategy. Therefore, the proof-of-authority process becomes more secure.
Candidates undergo rigorous identity validation and review before being approved. Real-world reputation is crucial.
Authority nodes take turns creating and signing new blocks every set interval (e.g., 15 seconds). The order is predetermined to prevent delays.
Other validators quickly receive and validate each signed block. They check that transactions abide by rules and that the previous hash is valid.
Once a majority (e.g., 2/3) of validators have signed off, the block is permanently added to the chain in an append-only manner.
Any validator acting outside the terms faces probation, eventually leading to removal if misconduct continues. This ensures honest behavior.
As you can see, PoA streamlines the consensus process through the upfront designation of trustworthy validators, avoiding the complexity and energy costs of PoW mining competitions.
While PoA provides efficiency gains, it is considered less decentralized than mechanisms like PoW due to its reliance on a small but secure set of validators.
There is potential for censorship if colluding authorities block certain transactions. However, the following factors maintain a reasonable level of decentralization:
Proof of authority is not fully decentralized but achieves a balance through transparency, accountability, and independent links between permissioned sidechains. This hybrid model maximizes efficiency without compromising too much on decentralization.
According to the World Bank, an estimated 1.7 billion adults worldwide remain unbanked as of 2017, demonstrating the large market need for innovative payment networks beyond traditional banking systems.
By reducing barriers to participation compared to other permissioned ledgers, PoA protocols may be able to onboard more of the unbanked population over time.
Both proof of authority and proof of stake (PoS) aim to improve over proof of work (PoW), but they take different approaches.
PoS is more decentralized by design with no predefined validators, while PoA relies on a limited set of authorities.
PoA depends on trusted, pre-selected validators through identity, experience, and permission. PoS requires a large economic stake but no permissions.
PoA matches low PoS costs without staking lockups since validators aren't subsidized via inflation.
PoA scales better than early PoS thanks to a streamlined low-latency validation process between known parties.
PoA suits private permissioned systems, while PoS aims to secure low-cost public platforms without pre-approval barriers.
Both algorithms improve on PoW, but PoA delivers faster, lower-fee transactions better suited for private infrastructure through its simplified validator setup and management.
PoW established blockchain credibility through intense energy-draining mining competitions. However, its disadvantages include:
Research from Coinmetrics found that in 2021, Ethereum blockchain transactions reached an all-time high of 1.7 million transactions per day on average. However, high transaction fees and network congestion continued to be a challenge due to the computational overhead of PoW consensus.
PoA blockchains capable of handling millions of transactions per day could be better positioned to scale for both existing and future application demands on distributed ledgers.
While PoW secures public networks through decentralization, PoA streamlines permissioned systems. Both have key roles to play depending on the desired balance between efficiency, costs, and censorship resistance for a given use case.
There is no single optimal solution. As the industry evolves, different consensus mechanisms, including cross-chain techniques, will integrate with one another.
In the future, we will see technology leveraged situationally depending on whether censorship resistance, chain performance, or purely low resource consumption are priorities.
Blockchain technology must continue innovating interoperable solutions, optimizing the balance between decentralization, security, and scalability, to meet evolving commercial and technical demands.
Proof of Authority speeds up validation between known, trusted parties, making it an effective and scalable way for permissioned blockchain networks to reach a consensus.
PoA strikes a balance between being less decentralized than PoW and having near-instant finality, low costs, and the high throughput that many enterprise applications need.
Going forward, we can expect PoA to play an increasingly important role in supporting core infrastructure, while mechanisms like PoW and PoS retain their value, securing public assets at scale.
As time goes on, more cross-chain innovations will figure out the best way to combine these algorithms based on each use case's security, performance, and resource needs.
People looking to participate in blockchain systems with a euro stablecoin may be interested in EURK. EURK is a securely audited reliable stablecoin that has reserves in Switzerland and the Dominican Republic, ensuring transparency and trustworthiness.
With EURK, users can benefit from fast and secure transactions on multiple blockchains while maintaining the stability of the euro. Contact us and become a partner for further information about euro stablecoin EURK advantages for your individual and business needs!
